the state trains, the multinational harvests and leaves

· originally published on LinkedIn

this is a translation of the spanish original · read the original

uruguay invests between us$ 50,000 and us$ 70,000 of public funds for every computer engineer who graduates from udelar, but the multinationals that hire that talent operate with full income tax exemption and can leave the country without paying back a single dollar. between 2024 and 2026, at least 1,300 workers in the sector were laid off en masse by companies like ukg, sabre, basf, pedidosya and verizon/alorica, most without even notifying the state. the fiscal cost of this cycle, free public education, generous exemptions, unemployment insurance and reinsertion programs, falls entirely on the uruguayan taxpayer. uruguay has one of the highest levels of tax expenditure in latin america (6% of gdp according to the imf) and, unlike argentina, chile or singapore, lacks recovery mechanisms for when beneficiary companies abandon the country.

training a developer costs the state between us$ 50,000 and us$ 70,000

udelar, which educates 90% of the country's university students, operates with an annual budget of approximately us$ 550 million. the average cost per graduate sits between us$ 30,700 (a 2011 estimate, búsqueda) and us$ 45,000 (more recent estimates from el observador). but at the school of engineering (fing), where the computer engineers most demanded by the market are trained, the numbers are worse: the program has a nominal duration of 5 years but the real average is 8 years, and only 16.3% of entrants ever graduate. when that systemic inefficiency is factored in, lab infrastructure, specialized faculty, additional years of training per student, the estimated cost per computer engineering graduate climbs to us$ 50,000-70,000.

fing produces some 130-180 degrees per year in computing and informatics programs. adding the graduates from ort, ucu, utec, utu and programs like jóvenes a programar (which trains 600-800 technicians per year in short programs), uruguay generates a modest flow of tech talent against a demand that cuti estimates at more than 3,000 unfilled openings. state investment is not limited to the university: plan ceibal absorbs some us$ 100 million per year; anii grants 206 graduate scholarships per year (us$ 20,000 per master's, us$ 48,000 per phd); and inefop allocates us$ 1.6 million to digital reskilling bootcamps. the full tech training ecosystem represents a fiscal effort measured in hundreds of millions of dollars per year.

tax exemptions reach 6% of gdp and the tech sector is one of the biggest beneficiaries

the uruguayan it sector billed us$ 3,681 million in 2024 (4.5% of gdp), exported us$ 2,323 million and directly employs some 20,500 people. it is the country's fourth-largest export. but a good part of that activity operates under regimes that minimize its tax contribution.

the free trade zones, zonamerica, aguada park, wtc free zone, offer full exemption from irae (25%), vat, wealth tax and every national tax present or future. in 2022, the country's 12 free trade zones directly employed 21,517 people, generated 35% of total exports and represented 6.6% of gdp. the tax expenditure attributable to free trade zones was us$ 298 million in 2017 according to opp. outside free trade zones, the investment promotion law (comap) allows irae exemptions of 30% to 100% for up to 25 years, and the exported services regime exempts all software exports from vat (22%).

the full picture is revealing: the dgi estimated the total cost of all investment incentives at some us$ 825 million per year. the imf, in its 2025 report, calculated uruguay's total tax expenditure at ~6% of gdp, the third-highest level in latin america, and recommended a "detailed reassessment of costs and benefits". the investment, decentralization and development category, which includes free trade zones and comap, represents 31.8% of total tax expenditure.

defenders of the regime cite a ceres study that calculates a return of us$ 6 to us$ 9.7 for every dollar exempted in free trade zones. however, that methodology counts exports and the jobs generated as "return", without discounting that the talent was trained with public funds nor that the companies might have set up shop without the incentive. the 2019 cepal/oxfam report itself warns that cost-benefit studies of tax incentives in the region "generally show that they are not cost-effective".

the pattern: they arrive, hire publicly trained talent, and leave by video

between 2024 and the beginning of 2026, uruguay experienced a wave of mass layoffs that exposed the fragility of the model.

ukg (ultimate kronos group), an hr software company, set up in 2022 and grew from 40 to more than 300 employees at the latu. in november 2025, it announced its total closure by corporate video and laid off 307 people. it did not return the government's calls. it operated three years in uruguay.

sabre corporation, installed in zonamerica since 2004 with between 700 and 900 employees, laid off ~200 people in 2023 and another 150 to 200 in february 2026, concentrating operations in india. the announcement came by video from dallas. the mtss received no prior notification.

basf services americas, which since 2014 has operated a shared services hub at the wtc montevideo with ~1,200 employees, announced in february 2026 the elimination of 360 to 480 positions (30-40% of its workforce) through the end of 2028, while opening a new center in hyderabad, india. a company executive had warned that costs in uruguay already matched those of germany. the mtss found out through the press.

pedidosya laid off 250 contact center workers in january 2024, outsourcing the service to a colombian company. it had obtained ~us$ 9 million in tax exemptions via comap by committing, among other indicators, to generate employment. no legal mechanism exists to recover those exemptions.

verizon/alorica closed its operation in aguada park in september 2025, laying off between 265 and 440 workers and moving operations to chile. there was no notification to the mtss either.

the cost to the state when the company leaves: at least us$ 10 million per wave of layoffs

when a multinational lays off workers en masse, the state absorbs multiple costs. unemployment insurance pays 66% of the average salary of the last 6 months, for a maximum duration of 6 months. for the ~1,100 tech workers laid off in this period, with an average sector salary of uyu 91,157/month (~us$ 2,300) according to cuti/cpa ferrere, the estimated cost of unemployment insurance comes to ~us$ 9.9 million.

to that you add spending on labor reskilling. inefop allocated barely us$ 1.6 million to its intensive digital bootcamp program, with 400 scholarships of up to 100,000 pesos each and an 80% placement rate. the budget is radically insufficient against the magnitude of the layoffs.

and the full cycle of unrecovered costs includes components that nobody adds up: free university education (us$ 50,000-70,000 per engineer), the years of irae exemption, the vat exemption on exported services, and the digital infrastructure built with public funds. severance payments are the company's responsibility, but the opportunity cost and the destruction of specialized human capital are absorbed by society.

argentina has clawbacks, chile audits, singapore negotiates: uruguay demands nothing

according to the oecd's investment tax incentives database (2024), 81% of economies condition at least one incentive on the investment's performance, and 67% require a minimum investment amount. uruguay grants benefits without robust recovery mechanisms.

argentina, with its knowledge economy law, requires beneficiary companies to meet at least 2 of 3 conditions (minimum r&d investment of 3%, quality certification, exports ≥8%). if after 3 years they fail to comply, they face revocation of the benefit and repayment of the exemptions received. in chile, corfo certifies and audits the projects that receive 35% tax credits. in colombia, the orange economy income tax exemption is lost from the third year onward if the committed minimum investment amount is not reached. brazil requires companies in the manaus free trade zone to comply with a basic production process and reinvest profits in the region.

the most sophisticated model is singapore's, where the economic development board negotiates each incentive case by case with quantifiable reciprocal commitments: investment in the country, creation of qualified jobs for citizens, transfer of frontier skills and contribution to local r&d. incentives are bilateral contracts, not automatic benefits.

the recommendation from the oecd and the platform for collaboration on tax (imf/oecd/un/world bank) is clear: incentives should be cost-based, credits for actual spending on r&d or employment, not profit-based, generic income exemptions, because the former tie the benefit directly to the desired activity. uruguay does exactly the opposite.

the debate has already begun, but regulation is arriving late

the ministry of labor presented in march 2026 a bill that requires companies to notify the state before executing collective layoffs. undersecretary hugo barreto framed it as the correction of a "deficit in regulation" in uruguay. the opposition reacted with alarm: senator da silva (partido nacional) warned that it "will only make them leave for another country"; ignacio munyo (ceres) called it an "investment scarecrow"; and cuti, through amílcar perea, asked to "strengthen competitiveness, not regulate layoffs". smoke everywhere.

the prior notice bill does not address the underlying problem. it includes no mechanisms to recover exemptions, no minimum permanence clauses tied to the tax benefits received, and no conditions for reinvestment in human capital training. the pedidosya case, us$ 9 million in comap exemptions followed by 250 layoffs and offshoring of the service, remains legally beyond reproach.

conclusion: the extractive cycle of publicly trained talent

the arithmetic of the full cycle is unfavorable for the uruguayan taxpayer. the state invests us$ 50,000-70,000 in training each computer engineer over an average of 8 years. the company that hires them, from a free trade zone, pays 0% irae on the income that talent generates. when headquarters decides to concentrate operations in india or chile, it lays people off over zoom, the state absorbs the cost of unemployment insurance (~us$ 9,000 per tech worker), and inefop tries to reskill the laid-off with a budget that isn't enough for 400 scholarships.

the uruguayan tech sector is a genuine success: us$ 3,681 million in revenue, 4.5% of gdp, latin america's second-largest software exporter per capita. but that success was built on a fundamental asymmetry. as the 15% global minimum tax (oecd pillar 2) begins to erode the effectiveness of exemptions for the largest multinationals, uruguay faces a window to redesign its incentive model. the experience of argentina, chile and singapore shows that it is possible to attract tech investment without giving away the human capital the state trained with public money. the question is not whether uruguay should offer incentives. it is whether it can keep offering them without demanding anything in return.

sources

fmi — "tax expenditures in uruguay" (2025) https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/selected-issues-papers/Issues/2025/11/03/Tax-Expenditures-in-Uruguay-571578

dgi / mef — "estimación del gasto tributario en uruguay 2021-2024" (may 2025)https://documentos.diputados.gub.uy/docs/rc/2024/PoderEjecutivo/Informe%20de%20Gastos%20Tributarios%202021%20-%202024.pdf

subrayado — "un egresado universitario cuesta al estado en promedio us$ 30 mil" https://www.subrayado.com.uy/un-egresado-universitario-cuesta-al-estado-promedio-us-30-mil-n4287

fing, udelar — "informe avance estudiantil 1997-2018" https://www.fing.edu.uy/sites/default/files/2022-03/Informe%20AvanceEstudiantil%20FING.pdf

opp — "los incentivos y apoyos públicos a la producción en el uruguay"https://otu.opp.gub.uy/gestor/imagesbiblioteca/c051605e094e44255322a48319168218053992c5.pdf

presidencia uruguay — "estado invierte 15 millones de dólares anuales para mantenimiento del plan ceibal"https://www.gub.uy/presidencia/comunicacion/noticias/estado-invierte-15-millones-dolares-anuales-para-mantenimiento-continuidad

bps — "fondo reconversión laboral (frl)" https://www.bps.gub.uy/10322/fondo-reconversion-laboral-frl.html

presidencia uruguay — "inefop destinará 65 millones de pesos para capacitaciones en tecnologías de la información"https://www.gub.uy/presidencia/comunicacion/noticias/inefop-destinara-65-millones-pesos-para-capacitaciones-tecnologias

uruguay xxi — "sector tic en uruguay" https://www.uruguayxxi.gub.uy/es/centro-informacion/articulo/sector-tic-en-uruguay/

el observador — "la multinacional ukg cierra sus operaciones en uruguay y despide a 300 profesionales"https://www.elobservador.com.uy/cafe-y-negocios/la-multinacional-ukg-cierra-sus-operaciones-uruguay-y-despide-300-profesionales-n6025098

montevideo portal — "la multinacional que despidió a 300 empleados en uruguay no responde llamadas del gobierno"https://www.montevideo.com.uy/Noticias/La-multinacional-que-despidio-a-300-empleados-en-Uruguay-no-responde-llamadas-del-gobierno-uc943823

subrayado — "empresa sabre comunicó a funcionarios que habrá entre 150 y 200 despidos"https://www.subrayado.com.uy/empresa-sabre-comunico-funcionarios-que-habra-150-y-200-despidos-n1000428

prensa mercosur — "basf reestructura su hub en uruguay: recorte del 30% a 40% de la plantilla"https://prensamercosur.org/2026/02/12/basf-reestructura-su-hub-en-uruguay-recorte-del-30-a-40-de-la-plantilla-y-alerta-por-costos-e-ia-id185714/

mpp — "los despidos de pedidosya y las exoneraciones fiscales que lo hicieron posible" https://mpp.org.uy/los-despidos-de-pedidosya-y-las-exoneraciones-fiscales-que-lo-hicieron-posible/

ámbito — "verizon cierra sus operaciones en el país y despide a 265 empleados en montevideo"https://www.ambito.com/uruguay/verizon-cierra-sus-operaciones-el-pais-y-despide-265-empleados-montevideo-n6185250

caras y caretas — "alorica no se va del país pero deja a 440 trabajadores en la calle"https://www.carasycaretas.com.uy/sindicales/alorica-no-se-va-del-pais-pero-deja-440-trabajadores-la-calle-n87726

ámbito — "el gobierno insiste con el preaviso de despidos tras nuevas reestructuraciones"https://www.ambito.com/uruguay/el-gobierno-insiste-el-preaviso-despidos-nuevas-reestructuraciones-empresariales-n6247514

ocde — "investment tax incentives database 2024 update"https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2025/03/oecd-investment-tax-incentives-database-2024-update_f3a3a175/b0de19dc-en.pdf

mef uruguay — "beneficios tributarios para zonas francas" http://zonasfrancas.mef.gub.uy/1064/4/areas/beneficios-tributarios-para-zonas-francas.html

el observador — "zonas francas generan un retorno seis veces superior al monto que les exonera el estado"https://www.elobservador.com.uy/nota/zonas-francas-generan-un-retorno-seis-veces-superior-al-monto-que-les-exonera-el-estado--202242717310

funds society — "las zonas francas representan el 5% del pbi y el 31% de las exportaciones de uruguay"https://www.fundssociety.com/es/noticias/negocio/las-zonas-francas-representan-el-5-del-pbi-y-el-31-de-las-exportaciones-de-uruguay/

misalario.uy — "seguro de paro uruguay: calculadora y cómo se calcula" https://misalario.uy/seguro-de-paro-uruguay/

infobae — "el sector tecnológico en uruguay representa el 4,3% de su pib y tiene un salario promedio de usd 2.300"https://www.infobae.com/america/america-latina/2024/04/25/el-sector-tecnologico-en-uruguay-representa-el-43-de-su-pib-y-tiene-un-salario-promedio-de-usd-2300/

all writing